It's hard to think when you're not used to it.
Please see the updated analysis at the bottom of this post for any corrections and notes.
Below is a list of predictions that famed psychic superhero Sylvia Browne made at the beginning of 2006. Let’s see how well she did.
Weather and Natural Disaster Predictions for 2006:
The weather this year will be worse than last year.
Miss. Sylvia had a 50% chance of getting this one right, but she just guessed wrong. Of course, she didn’t do any worse than professionals at the National Hurricane Center.
Hits: 0, Misses: 1, Percent Correct: 0%
Hurricanes will hit in the north east US.
Miss. The 2006 Atlantic Hurricane Season was milder than expected, and no hurricanes made landfall. Even though Tropical Storm Beryl did hit the north east US, this still qualifies as a miss since she predicted that more than one hurricane would hit the northeast (which, incidentally, was the claim that the NHC made for 2006 as well.).
Hits: 0, Misses: 2, Percent Correct: 0%
Two more earthquakes in Asia.
Miss. According to the US Geological Survey there were a total of 28,828 earthquakes worldwide in 2006, many of which were undoubtedly in Asia . Since 1990, the annual average number of earthquakes worldwide is 23055.6. While the numbers appear to be increasing since the 1990s, the USGS attributes this to an increase in the number of seismic monitoring stations around the world, and a resultant increase in our ability to detect earthquakes.
Hits: 0, Misses: 3, Percent Correct: 0%
Small quakes in Washington and California.
Miss. In 2006 there were approximately 123 earthquakes in California. You might think this is a hit, until you consider that there are over 100 small quakes in California alone each year. In addition, there are roughly 9 small earthquakes per year in Washington every year since 2000.
Hits: 0, Misses: 4, Percent Correct: 0%
Floods in the midwest as usual.
Miss. There were several flood events in the midwest in 2006, but these were hardly usual. In June and September, several states recorded some of their wettest months on record. If Sylvia had predicted that, “The entire state of Kentucky would have it’s 2nd wettest September on record”, then we might have handed it to her.
Hits: 0, Misses: 5, Percent Correct: 0%
Floods in the south east in the spring.
Miss. The National Climate Data Center tracked no significant flooding events in the south east US at any time in 2006.
Hits: 0, Misses: 6, Percent Correct: 0%
Health Predictions for 2006:
There will be no pandemic with the Bird Flu. Asia will be hit with it, but the rest of the world it will be contained.
Miss. True, there is no global pandemic yet, but the potential of a pandemic seems unlikely anyway since there have been only 263 cases of Avian Influenza (H5N1) reported to the World Health Organization between 2003 and 2006. The numbers are climbing on an annual basis, and 2006 was the first year that saw confirmed cases of H5N1 infection outside of Asia. Up until 2005, when Sylvia made these predictions, ALL cases had been contained. 2006 saw that containment broken, contrary to her prediction.
Hits: 0, Misses: 7, Percent Correct: 0%
A new replacement for insulin.
Miss. In 2000, it was reported that a promising molecule was discovered that may act as an insulin replacement. Now, Sylvia may have meant a new way to take insulin. Indeed, 2006 saw the FDA approve a new inhaled insulin product called Exubera. I would give her this hit if there was not previously published information in 2005 that the FDA was planning to review Exubera in January 2006, and that one FDA Panel had already approved it in 2005.
Hits: 0, Misses: 8, Percent Correct: 0%
There will be some kind of vaccination for certain types of cancer. Stomach and colon.
Miss. There was promising news about colon cancer vaccines way back in 1999 here and here and 2001.
Predicting that there will be “some kind of vaccination for certain types of cancers” sounds impressive, until you consider that researchers have been working on cancer vaccines since at least the 20th century.
Hits: 0, Misses: 9, Percent Correct: 0%
There will be advancements in treatments for plaque in the heart valves.
Miss. I cannot find any documented reports of advancements in treatments for plaque in the heart valves. A search of the FDA site for heart valve only returns results concerning prosthetic heart valve information from 2004.
Hits: 0, Misses: 10, Percent Correct: 0%
A breakthrough in MS involving the hypothalamus gland.
Miss. A search of PubMed reveals that the hypothalamus is involved in some MS cases, and this was known as early as 1998. Interestingly, 2004 saw several reports on MS cases with hypothalamic involvement, but there were none since then.
Hits: 0, Misses: 11, Percent Correct: 0%
A vaccine that blocks the need for nicotine.
Miss. The National Drug Administration reported in October, 2000 that a nicotine vaccine was heading toward clinical trials. In 2003, Science Daily also reported on a nicotine vaccine. Interestingly, in Nov. 2005, roughly a month or so before Sylvia’s 2006 predictions came out, some bloggers were reporting about favorable results of nicotine vaccine trials.
Hits: 0, Misses: 12, Percent Correct: 0%
Celebrity Predictions for 2006:
Britney Spears will divorce. She finds her husband not what she thought he was.
Miss. While Spears and Federline indeed filed for divorce in 2006, this was widely blogged about in late 2005.
Hits: 0, Misses: 13, Percent Correct: 0%
Bruce Willis will marry a very young dark haired woman.
Miss. Bruce is still single, and was single throughout 2006.
Hits: 0, Misses: 14, Percent Correct: 0%
Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt will marry.
Miss. Brangelina are not yet married, though it was widely reported in late 2005 that they were having an affair on the set of Mr. and Mrs. Smith. Indeed, the government of Vietnam reports that the couple cannot adopt a Vietnamese child if they remain unmarried.
Hits: 0, Misses: 15, Percent Correct: 0%
Jennifer Aniston will also marry.
Miss. Jennifer is unmarried.
Hits: 0, Misses: 16, Percent Correct: 0%
Russell Crowe will get into more trouble. He needs anger management.
Miss. Russell Crowe certainly has a history of being temperamental, but he managed to avoid anger management issues in 2006, unless you count smoking inside a no-smoking zone during a concert.
Hits: 0, Misses: 17, Percent Correct: 0%
Jennifer Lopez should be careful with her health. She will also become pregnant.
Miss. J-Lo is in great health, though it was rumored in late 2005 that she might want to have a baby. To date, she has not.
Hits: 0, Misses: 18, Percent Correct: 0%
Nicole Kidman will marry a producer and she have a baby girl.
Miss. Nicole married Country Music Star Keith Urban on June 25, 2006, and it was rumored, again in late 2005, that she might be pregnant. She was not.
Hits: 0, Misses: 19, Percent Correct: 0%
Economics Predictions for 2006:
Gold and property remain good investments.
Miss. It was widely reported in late 2005 that investors should put money into real estate as well as gold and silver. Parroting the advice of experts is not a superpower.
Hits: 0, Misses: 20, Percent Correct: 0%
The LA property bubble will not burst, not for about three or four years, and then it will just level off.
Miss. According to Wikipedia,
Unlike a stock market crash following a bubble, a real-estate “crash” is usually a slower process, because sellers just decide not to sell. Historically due to inflation, prices do not fall in nominal terms, rather they stay “flat” for a period of 3-5 years. In select markets though, housing prices have fallen in real and nominal dollars, such as Los Angeles during the early to mid 1990s. Due to low inflation in most countries, future corrections may result in a fall in both real and nominal house values.
Based on this, it doesn’t take superpowers to claim that a real-estate bubble would not “burst”.
Hits: 0, Misses: 21, Percent Correct: 0%
Interest rates will go up a bit.
Miss. Interest rates fluctuate on a daily basis, but the historical trend has been downward. Bankrate.com reports that the fed began raising interest rates in 2004 (and continued through 2005) due to a strengthening economy, but and stopped in 2006. The prediction of most professionals was that rates would rise through 2006.
Hits: 0, Misses: 22, Percent Correct: 0%
Gov. Schwarzenegger will lose popularity. He will run again because his ego will make him. He will be defeated if he runs.
Miss. Gov Schwarzenegger’s popularity started falling in 2005, and surprisingly rose in 2006 due to some well placed pandering.
Hits: 0, Misses: 23, Percent Correct: 0%
President Bush’s popularity will continue to decline. He will become embroiled in more scandals.
Hit. OK - this one is a gift, but Sylvia’s doing so poorly now, that I had to throw her a bone.
Hits: 1, Misses: 23, Percent Correct: 4.2%
Bush has some neurological problems.
Miss. Unless you count a double-digit IQ as a neurological problem. Most people don’t.
Hits: 1, Misses: 24, Percent Correct: 4.0%
The 2008 election will be between Kerry and McCain, and Kerry will win in a close vote.
Unknown. It’s not 2008 yet, though Kerry doesn’t look like he’s going to be in the race.
(Edit: The day after I posted this, Kerry announced that he would not join the 2008 presidential race. It’s possible that he’ll still “flip-flop” on this decision, just as President Bush did on his attitude about nation building. Since such flip-flopping is seen as completely endearing in John Kerry - especially among republican voters, this may be the only way that he would be able to overtake the rest of the Democratic field and defeat McCain in 2008. Yeah, right. This is most likely another miss.)
Hits: 1, Misses: 24, Percent Correct: 4.0%
There will not be a woman President in her [Sylvia’s] lifetime.
Unknown. Sylvia’s still alive, and it’s not beyond the realm of possibility that there would be a woman elected president in 2008. Of course, it’s possible that Sylvia is predicting her own demise prior to the 2008 election.
Hits: 1, Misses: 24, Percent Correct: 4.0%
By the end of 2006 troops will begin returning from Iraq.
Miss. Troop levels were reduced from 160,000 to 138,000 in early 2006, though the president wants to “surge” troop levels back up.
Hits: 1, Misses: 25, Percent Correct: 3.8%
Trains and trucks continue to concern her as far as safety and terrorism.
Unknown. This isn’t really a prediction.
Hits: 1, Misses: 25, Percent Correct: 3.8%
A caller asked about a serial rapist in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Sylvia said his first name was Benand his second was Halle or Hally. He works as a line painter on the roads. That’s why he can get around so much. He will be caught within the next month or two.
Miss. Miss. Hit. There was a serial rapist in Tulsa from around 2003 until 2006, and a suspect was arrested within 2 months after Sylvia’s prediction (hit). His name was Gary Graham (not Bernard Hally) (miss), and he worked as a security guard (miss). As far as I know, he is still awaiting trial.
Again this hit is a gift - the Tulsa police credit their suspects arrest to, “a massive team effort, volunteers who canvassed the city with flyers, officers who questioned hundreds of people, detectives who culled through thousands of tips, lab scientists who worked overtime and a task force that gave up time with their own families to help protect ours”.
Hits: 2, Misses: 27, Percent Correct: 6.9%
Nothing will happen over Iran, it’s all a lot of talk.
Miss. In January, 2006 Iran broke the IAEA seals on it’s nuclear reactor and began enriching uranium. The IAEA brought Iran before the UN Security council, which voted in December to impose sanctions.
Hits: 2, Misses: 28, Percent Correct: 6.67%
North Korea and China is more concerning, but not anytime soon.
Unknown. This is not a prediction, although North Korea did test a nuclear device, which would make this a miss.
Hits: 2, Misses: 28, Percent Correct: 6.67%
The US will not move into Syria.
Hit. The US did not invade Syria.
Hits: 3, Misses: 28, Percent Correct: 9.7%
She feels the terrorists will hit European countries other than the US.
Miss. There was a major terrorist plot in London in August 2006 that was foiled (the targets were jetliners bound for the US). In addition, the US State Department announced that, “The September 2006 attack on the U.S. Embassy in Syria and the March 2006 bombing near the U.S. Consulate in Karachi, Pakistan, illustrate the continuing desire of extremists to strike American targets.”
Hits: 3, Misses: 29, Percent Correct: 9.4%
Analysis:
Here we see 32 testable predictions for 2006, of which which Sylvia Browne got 3 correct, for a raw percentage of 9.4% correct (3 out of 32). Notice, however, calculating her accuracy isn’t this simple. We also need to consider the positive and negative predictions she made, and determine if the events that were predicted to occur (or to NOT occur) did or did not occur.
In addition, we need to consider the situations in which events occurred that Sylvia did not predict. Of the 32 predictions, 30 of them were positive predictions, meaning that she predicted something would happen, and the remaining 2 predictions were negative, meaning that she predicted that something would not happen (the US would Not invade Syria, for example). If you examine each of the 30 positive predictions, you will see that, in 29 of those cases, something other than what Sylvia predicted occurred. So. to really examine her superpower, we have to look at her positive and negative predictions against their respective positive and negative outcomes.
To do this, we break the data out into a 2X2 contingency table:
| Event Observed | Event Not Observed | Totals | |
| Event Predicted | 1 | 29 | 30 |
| Event Not Predicted | 29 | 2 | 31 |
| Totals | 30 | 31 | 61 |
Using the Key below, we can calculate some verification statistics:
(a+d)/n Percent Correct (PC) = 4.9%
This one is very simple - what percentage of positively predicted events actually occurred and predicted non-events that actually didn’t occur. Here’s Sylvia’s batting roughly one in twenty.
a/(a+c) Hit rate = true positive fraction = sensitivity = 3.3%
As a superhero, Sylvia Browne’s psychic sensitivity actually limps in at an impotent 3.3%. This number represents the percent of times that she positively predicted an event that actually occurred.
b/(b+d) False alarm rate = 1- specificity = 96.7%
The false alarm rate represents the percentage of phony predictions. This has the same meaning as a false alarm in the real world - someone who trips a false fire alarm is claiming there’s an emergency when one doesn’t actually exist. For Sylvia Browne’s 2006 predictions, the term false alarm should stick in your mind.
Key:
| Event Observed | Event Not Observed | Totals | |
| Event Predicted | A | B | A+B |
| Event Not Predicted | C | D | C+D |
| Totals | A+C | B+D | N |
Update and Corrections:
One perceptive reader was kind enough to check my math and point out some errors that I made above. The main error was that I doubled up the number of predictions so the total N was 61. This should have been 32. Also, some of the calculations are incorrect. Below is what I think is the correct picture:
Sylvia Browne’s 2006 Predictions Analysis
|
No. of In-Fact Events
|
1
|
31
|
|
Event Type
|
||
|
Event Occurred
|
Event Did Not Occur
|
|
| Prediction Type | ||
|
Event Predicted to Occur
|
1
|
29
|
|
Event Not Predicted to Occur
|
0
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
p(Hit) = 0.50
|
p(FA) = 0.935
|
|
|
P(correct)
|
0.094
|
|
Notes:
This analysis was conducted using the data I referenced above and a signal detection calculator found here, which includes a correction for extreme values of hits and false alarms (0 or 1.0).
The adjusted P(Hit) value of .5 (that’s 50%) hits is artificially high due to the very small number (1) of events that were both predicted and actually occurred. Note that over 90% of the time in this set of predictions, Sylvia predicted something that did not actually come to pass - which is reflected in the high false alarm rate.
As stated before, the term false alarm should stick in your mind when considering Sylvia Browne’s predictions.
Steve’s No Direction Home Page » Blog Archive » Sylvia Browne’s Predictions for 2006
January 26th, 2007 at 4:17 pm
[…] How well did the bloodsucking fraud Sylvia Browne do in her predictions for 2006? Not very well. In fact, it’s hard to see how she could have done much worse. […]
Stupid Evil Bastard
January 30th, 2007 at 6:50 pm
I Must Be Doing Something Right
There are times when I go weeks and weeks without writing anything, although I've been a bit inspired after having attended the Amaz!ng Meeting earlier this month. Apparently, I must be doing something right, since James Randi himself references m…
A replacement for Sylvia Browne « The Sceptical Preacher
February 5th, 2007 at 3:31 pm
[…] A replacement for Sylvia Browne Over at smugbaldy.com, you’ll find an analysis of Sylvia Browne’s predictions for 2006. Silvia didn’t do too well, resulting in an accuracy rate of around 3%. […]
victoria
June 29th, 2007 at 2:53 pm
you really tried hard to make her wrong on a couple of them. u kinda twisted it
Smug Baldy
June 29th, 2007 at 4:00 pm
I actually went out of my way to give her the benefit of the doubt. For example, I scored her prediction that President Bush’s popularity would continue to decline as a hit. In addition, I also scored her prediction that the US would not invade Syria as a hit. In both cases, she predicted something that was very likely to occur, but they were nevertheless hits.
Lynn
July 29th, 2007 at 2:27 pm
I appreciate having some place I can gripe about Sylvia Browne. I don’t understand why anyone would think she is a spiritual person. To me she appears to be an ignorant, low class, coarse and uneducated broad. What you Americans call “red-neck” or “trailer trash”. Where did this woman come from? She speaks to people with contempt, she has little patience and even less compassion. That is not my idea of a spiritual person. I would like to know why Montel Williams still has her on his show. I think she will be his undoing eventually. She claims to have helped many in their search for missing people. Has anyone ever stepped up to the plate to confirm this? Who are these people she has helped. Where is there documented information. I’m surprised no one ever mentions those awful fingernail weapons and the way she continually scratches at her head. Any time I see her I have the creepy feeling that something is living in that wig of hers.
Smug Baldy
August 3rd, 2007 at 4:20 pm
Hi Lynne - Someone has definitely stepped up and is tracking Sylvia’s antics on a regular basis. That would be Robert Lancaster who runs StopSylviaBrowne.com at http://www.stopsylviabrowne.com/home/
Christine
August 16th, 2007 at 6:16 pm
Thanks for taking the time to do this. She is not for real. I used to read her books, and then one day I woke up.
Hope you crunch her predictions for the next year
Annie
August 16th, 2007 at 11:00 pm
i think she gives hope to people. people who are afraid of death. even if she was a fake, i think that if people are willing to beleive her then let them do it. let them beleive if they want to. i want too.
Smug Baldy
August 19th, 2007 at 5:58 pm
Christine - Thanks, I’m already trying to find the “definitive” set of predictions Sylvia made for 2007. I found a couple different edited lists, but I haven’t found two lists that were the same. If I can get hold of her predictions for 2007, you can bet that I’ll report her accuracy in early 2008.
Annie - you’re certainly welcome to believe what you want, but your comment points out the insidious nature of people like Sylvia. She’s a wolf in sheep’s clothing. While she may appear to offer hope, I would suggest that you can find hope in other places. Re-read your favorite book, volunteer to help folks in your community, re-connect with old friends or family members. Sylvia Browne is an entertainer, with no more special powers than anyone else. Heck, you’re as psychic as Sylvia Browne.
Sylvia certainly doesn’t offer hope to everyone. As an entertainer playing a psychic, she’s often horribly, horribly wrong. Take Shawn Hornbeck’s parents for example. Sylvia’s superpower allowed her to tell them that their son had been murdered, and they had to experience the greatest anguish a parent could know, the death of their child. Never mind that Sylvia is usually guessing, and this time she guessed wrong as we all found out later that Shawn was alive and (relatively) well. Take again, for example, the families of the trapped Sago miners who rejoiced when Sylvia predicted on live TV that they would be found alive and well, only to find their hopes dashed when she again guessed badly.
I think there’s nothing wrong with offering people hope, but there’s certainly something wrong with offering false hope. Fakers like Sylvia have been around forever, preying on the weak and the hopeless, claiming direct knowledge of God’s plans while working minor miracles with all the craft of a polished stage magician, and offering a glimpse of their “perfect world” as long as you have the coin to drop in her plate. Don’t be fooled by the show. You want hope? Donate more time and energy to charity - you’ll get much much more hope out of that.
Jennifer
August 19th, 2007 at 6:58 pm
i believe in people having visions and people having gifts from god, and i also believe in the devil doing the same thing to people… but im not gonna get into that right now……. but sylvia browne does seem like she is cold, i agree with what someone above me said… and i would be embarrassed if i was to claim 30 predictions and none of them came true… well the obvious ‘duh’ predictions were true… but that can be wrote off as an educated guess… haha i remember she said we would find bin laden too…
Molly
August 23rd, 2007 at 2:01 pm
I have to admit after reading the evidence I have seen on this sites and others that Sylvia Browne is a fraud. Truth is important to me. What bothers me, and why I continue to have a grain of faith is that her books get me though some very tough times. I used to read self help books when I got depressed (depression is a big part of my life.) But, they just said the same thing over and over. But, Sylvia’s books bring me out of depression so quickly they are the first things I reach for. So now I’m struggling again. It makes me wonder which is more important unadulterated truth or happiness?
davis
August 30th, 2007 at 10:58 pm
i love sylvia browne. and i love her books, i have almost every one, and i will buy more, every time she puts a new one out.
KRICH
September 1st, 2007 at 3:02 am
Please, please explore http://www.stopsylviabrowne.com before you give her $750 for a 20 minute reading!
French
September 2nd, 2007 at 11:42 am
To Molly,
If you want truth and relief from depresion, read the Bible. It costs much less and in most, has a directory of where you could find and read a chapter related to every experience you will ever encounter. I tried to help.
Kristin
September 5th, 2007 at 11:08 am
The majority of them are predators. While I believe there are some who are modestly gifted I do not believe for a second that she is one of them. During a deep depression I consulted a psychic who gave me so much false hope that I continued to spend money just to feel reassurred that I would eventually be OK….and eventually I was but not as a direct result of some immoral wack job claiming what wasn’t at all true. I got better when I received the help I needed and focussed my energies inward towards healing. The ONLY thing that the psychic did for me was rob me of a large amount of cash. Was I desperate? Absolutely…..but I was also wise enough to eventually see it for what it was…..a hoax….a very expensive lesson to learn…..what goes around comes around though and I do take some solace in that.
sheila margel
September 5th, 2007 at 8:34 pm
I have read a lot of Sylvia’s books and they are books certainly written by a person with a lot of wisdom. If you read her books,open your mind and give it at least the benefit of doubt, you will find that a lot of her statements make a lot of sense. For example, I myself never belive in reencarnation but after reading a lot of her books with an open mind it made a lot of sense and a lot of things in the world make sense too. Sylvia Brown has a special gift, she can see and hear things that not all of us are able to do, she can predict things that will or could happen, BUT she is human, and she can also make mistakes and misunderstand the information she recieves OR interpretes from her spiritual guide (OR ANGELS, OR OTHER SPIRITS, OR JUST SIMPLY FROM OUT OF THIS WORLD/the other side, or Heaven, )I belive she is a wise person and that she indeed has a gift that not all of us have. Maybe some of the misinterpretations of her predictions were not accurate, maybe it was supposed to be that way, in order for other situations to lead to others. Only GOD knows exactly what and how and when ( in our earth time) things will happend with 100% accuracy. Sylvia Browne as a psycic not a God and the information she gets from her spiritual resources is what she interpretes as her truth, and remember she is not God and she is not supposed to know everything or reveal everything with 100% accuracy. Has it ever occurred to you that if all psycics would know everything there would be no need for challenge in the world. Talking about Sylvia Browne, she is a lady with a special gift, I do belive so, only someone like her would be able to write with so much wisdom making a lot of sense. I believe when she gets information to reveal to us about our lifes she only reveals what she sees and interpretes as her truth, whatever she doesn’t say, she haven’t been revealed by her spiritual sources, and you must ask why? The reason I believe is because in order to live this life the way we are suppose to live it, we have to find it out by ourselves and by the choices we make in our lives what is going to happen and also to experience by ourselves life itself.
Hmmmm
September 6th, 2007 at 12:33 pm
Wow, that’s unbelievably consistent in terms of being wrong. Virtually EVERY SINGLE prediction was incorrect–is this a form of psychic ability in itself?!
pssht
September 6th, 2007 at 5:02 pm
ahem. everything you have stated up top is lies and yes have been twisted . Just cause shes helping the future more then anyone else on this damn planet doesnt mean you can go around stating lies.
Smug Baldy
September 7th, 2007 at 11:10 am
To Hmmmm : Think shotgun blast at long range. Lots and lots of pellets fly out, but only a few hit Dick Cheney’s friend in the face. This is similar to Sylvia’s prediction style - she says a lot of crazy things, most of which never come to pass, and people remember the one or two that do and say, “Wow, she’s gifted”. Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
The way Sylvia is incorrect doesn’t imply psychic powers. The vast majority of her errors are known as “False Alarms”, meaning she predicted events that never actually came to pass. One example is her false alarm prediction that Britney Spears would divorce in 2006. While this was widely speculated to occur in 2006, and they actually filed for divorce in 2006, Britney and K-Fed didn’t actually divorce until 2007, since you’re not divorced until your divorce is finalized. Other predictions are easier to show to be false alarms:
Sylvia - Nicole Kidman will have a baby girl in 2006.
Nicole Kidman - “Nope.”
False alarms are the “Boy who cried wolf” errors. She’s an entertainer, and she’s preying on people’s hopes and desires to make a buck. The fact that she can get away with it makes me think that she must be gifted, that or there are many more overly-trusting people in the world.
To pssht: ahem. Prove it. I provided citations for most of my claims. For example, Sylvia predicted “Gov. Schwarzenegger will lose popularity. He will run again because his ego will make him. He will be defeated if he runs.” And I responded with historical evidence showing that his popularity rose. In addition, since the election is now over, we can go back an look to see if he was defeated. Nope, Sylvia was wrong again.
Where are your citations to support your dumb statement? It’s interesting that trolls like you drive by with a comment expressing skepticism in the face of historical facts, but you don’t express any skepticism at the wacky things people like Sylvia Browne says. I wonder why that is.
Teri
September 12th, 2007 at 12:39 am
It always amazes me that there are people out there that put so much effort in discounting what others do. Of course, I’m one that doesn’t believe the human race ever had a tail or gills too. And, I’m not so closed minded that I refuse to believe there’s much more intelligent life on other planets or even at deeper levels of Earth. Since I do believe in God I also believe that He has a flawless sense of humor and an abundance of patience or he would have nuked the human race a long time ago. Have you ever received a rebuttal from Sylvia Browne? I already know the answer to that, No. Have you figured out why? I’ll help you out on this one. It’s because she doesn’t have to prove herself to you or anyone else. She’s in popular demand which is more than I can say for you.
Cathy
September 12th, 2007 at 9:09 pm
How dare you say that about Sylvia Browne. Shes the nicest person on this planet who helps people everyday! Thats probably a lot more than you do with your life. Your a bunch of sick people who put people down just because your bored. Your probably jealous you cant and aren’t as succesful as she is and your just losers with no lives. She has helped me in so many ways and you no nothing about her or what she beleives in so educate yourself and read some of her books!
Mike
September 12th, 2007 at 9:53 pm
For all the Sylvia supporters out there, there is an explanation as to why you ignore cold hard facts and are oblivious to the showmanship of her craft…
you are simply misguided twits, pawns of the media who seek direction from
anyone who offers you slightest bit of comfort for your neanderthal developed minds.
Sabine
September 13th, 2007 at 5:25 am
It’s refreshing to see that there are still people out there that want to get to the truth. But, it’s also nice to see that faith, trust and hope are alive and well amongst the human race.
Personally, I’m undecided about Sylvia. I live in Australia and, until recently, ‘Montel’ was not broadcasted here. The few times that I have caught a show where she was a guest, I watched with intrigue and curiosity.
Members of the audience seemed to lap up whatever she said. Some would agree with certain things that Sylvia said. I was, however, deeply shocked when she told a young woman that her mother would pass away very soon (due to ilness).
This statement was delivered in a cold , heartless fashion with no sign of sympathy or empathy. That’s not my idea of spirituality.
I am yet to decide what I think of Sylvia, but I’ll be sure to check back here now and then for any updates.
Smug Baldy
September 14th, 2007 at 1:16 pm
Teri, glad I amaze you. Here’s to hoping I can continue doing so.
Cathy, I dare because fortune favors the bold. Carpe Diem! I’m a conceptual swashbuckler, hacking away against the entrenched forces of inanity and foolishness with my little old keyboard. I must ask, though, why do you fight so hard for the dark side? You know logic and reason will eventually prevail over superstition and magical thinking, yes? By the way, Sylvia never helped you. You helped yourself, and kudos for that! Now go read some Stephen Jay Gould and shush you.
Mike, I like the attitude and forcefulness of your argument, although I always thought it’s rude to call people who believe stupid things stupid. That’s just me though.
Sabine, I think your indecision is fair, as is the encouragement you take about faith and trust. These are indeed good things. Of course, if your read anything else on my site, you’ll see that faith and trust can be misplaced. With psychics, the faith we may have is hard to shake because we want to believe, and sometimes they even wind up being right. I knock Sylvia simply because her record doesn’t match her claims - and it’s her claims that can hurt people.
Dre
September 17th, 2007 at 11:30 am
You guys are so mean, just let the old hag be for pete’s sake!
Dani
September 18th, 2007 at 4:35 pm
After reading this website I have become quite curious. I checked Sylvia Browne’s official website and several unofficial ones to see if I could read her predictions for myself but I can’t find them. Would someone be so kind to direct me to a few websites where I could find these predictions?
Dan
September 19th, 2007 at 10:15 pm
Ok, now we have this claim that people say that Smug is biased, ok thats fine say he is biased, that in itself is not an argument. Show a particular example of how he is being biased. Did Slyvia predict things things? (probably) Did I look it up myself no. However, if I were to go around saying that I hear dead people they would lock me up in an insane asylum. How come she roams free?
Nikki
September 21st, 2007 at 6:26 pm
You people who whole heartedly support sylvia amaze me sometimes. You remind of the people who cling to that famous picture of the loch ness monster that was proven a hoax and admitted to being faked by the picture taker himself! Sylvia followers also remind me of a cult - brainwashed without a thought of their own. Even if sylvia begins endorsing nikes and buzz cuts - please think on your own before drinking the kool-aid(which she will no doubt charge $750 a cup for)! Please go with an open mind and seriously read the articles on stopesylviabrowne.com. The fact of the matter is SHE IS HURTING PEOPLE. There are many more incidents besides the horrible thing she did to Shawn Hornbecks parents. Some people have claimed that she doesn’t have to prove herself to anyone. If you had half a brain - she should have to prove herself to you before you put such faith in her. And those wonderful eloquent books you are thanking her for….listen to her talk sometime…..does it even remotely sound like the same person who wrote those books? Does she sound overly educated to you? All this site and other people are asking you to do is think. But hey, I guess you would rather have a “psychic” do the thinking for you. Many props to this site and Robert’s for trying to get the truth out to people who haven’t been brain washed yet. And for not giving up on those who have.
John
September 24th, 2007 at 11:38 am
It seems to me that you haven’t done your research on her teachings. She herself states that we have to find our own truth,and many of the arguments that most of you are making against her, like not following someone else or depending on someone else for all the answers is exactly what she teaches. Her teachings also go along with those of John Edwards and Gary Zuchav. As well as the books The Davinci Code and Holy blood Holy grail, which I know many people oppose because for some reason they want to believe that Jesus died for our sins and if we are “bad” we will go to hell. She teaches that there is no hell, no devil,no demons. We live, we learn, and we go home to an all loving god. Many of you have stated for others to read the bible for inspiration, which is fine for some. But for those of us who are sick to death of hearing about death and destruction by a god whose wrath comes in the middle of night by the way of plague or fire or flood have chosen to seek our own truth. We could debate for eternity about religion and spirituality. All I know, is the amount of hate and rudeness that most of you are writing, not just about sylvia browne, but to each other is ridiculous.
Anyway, back to the point. All of her predictions have not come true, that is a fact. But she herself states that she is not always correct. Had you actually taken the time to listen to her you would know this. She also says to not follow anyone elses truth, but to find your own. She does not bash religion of any kind and she is a strong advocate of Jesus’ teachings. It’s kind of like when five people witness an accident and they all perceive it in different ways. When a psychic predicts something, they are stating what they see. The fact that she said “hurricanes” in the Northeast when only one tropical storm headed that way does not make it a miss. I think you’re nitpicking in order to add to your argument. Most likely she saw what looked like a hurricane near the north east and said hurricanes. First of all you need to do more research on the person you are bashing, for instance, her teachings and not just the fact she has gotten some things wrong. Everyone makes mistakes. Who have you known to be absolutely to a fault correct? And you say, well, she’s taking money for this gift that she has. As far as I have read, she donates a considerable amount to her church, Novus Spiritus, which offers many free services. You might want to research that as well. And don’t just read what people have written on the internet. You can’t always trust their research or maybe they’re just flat out lying. I am asking you as someone who now has this responsibility to educate us to do your own research on her, her church and her place in the community. Secondly,if you are going to have a website, don’t you think it necessary for it to be an open debate, for those of all opinions and not just a free for all bashing of those who don’t agree with you? And shouldn’t you require that however strong someone feels about the subject that they not verbally attack someone else on your site? Most of what I’ve read from you is your ideas being shoved down everyone’s throat and if they don’t agree with you, they get the axe as well. You need to be open to others opinions and research in order to have a well rounded discussion here. But if your point here is simply to educate others and not have an open discussion, don’t you think people would listen more if your words weren’t so angry? And I’m sorry to say this, but some of your misses would not be considered misses to others. It would depend on how you looked at it.(See the hurricanes example)
Thank you for your time and space to state my opinion, John.
Nikki
September 24th, 2007 at 6:58 pm
John - just a little FYI - when you state that he should be “open to other’s opinions” makes you look a little silly. Read the title of his page - Free Thinking My Way Toward Becoming A Curmudgeon
Look up the word Curmudgeon.
Go read the information on stopsylviabrowne.com about her church and where it gets its funds from. If you want us to be open to your ideas then you have to be open to the fact that she may not be the angel you think she is. If she is so damn spiritual then how come she hasn’t apologized to the families that she has upset so badly by being so wrong(Like Shawn). We could all make the same “predictions” she has and have the same accuracy. Predictions about weather are vague and can be done by anyone who can make educated guesses. The things she was specific about - she was dead wrong on. She isn’t anymore psychic than my shoe. Sorry for the sudden burst of reality.
ringo
September 28th, 2007 at 11:50 am
i still cant believe that there are people who are defending her…
magenta
September 29th, 2007 at 7:30 pm
This is very skewed. No one - not even a very gifted psychic - is going to be 100% accurate in all of their predictions, but that does not mean they aren’t gifted. I have watched Sylvia and read a few of her books, and whether or not her predictions are coorect - her books prove her deep spiritual understanding. I actually saw her in her predictions say that Jennifer Lopez wants children but that she is reproductively challenged - so who si to say these are even the predictions that she made. And how do you know that Bush doesn’t have a neurological problem - no one has probably ever done a test to see.
Brandi
October 1st, 2007 at 11:33 am
Why does it really matter if Sylvia is right or wrong, if she is for real or not?! If people want to believe in her, let them. If they find comfort in believeing the things she predicts, why should you care? Weather she is ral or not, I find it entertaining anyway.
Mahi Danli
October 6th, 2007 at 4:13 pm
It doesn’t matter, frankly. And she’s been right quite alot before anyways.
T.G.
October 8th, 2007 at 12:58 pm
Any shingle-hanging “psychic ” who charges $700 an hour BETTER be 100% correct, or I have BETTER places to spend it!
lol
October 9th, 2007 at 8:20 pm
can anyone make a list of what she was right about?
Natalie
October 10th, 2007 at 3:54 pm
Someone probably could make a list, but no one ever will because she isn’t right about very many things. No Sylvia detractor would bother trying to compile such a list, since it would just end up being misused:
Diehard Sylvia Fan: “Look, Sylvia has made 50* correct predictions!”
Rational Skeptic: “Uh, she’s made 18,735,913* predictions in five years. Her accuracy rate sucks, dude.”
And any Sylvia supporter that began making such a list would probably end up realizing she’s a fraud, and quit making the list at that point.
Anyone who makes as many random, vague predictions as she does will end up being right some of the time. The techniques of cold reading help boost her accuracy rate somewhat (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_reading), but she isn’t even a very good cold reader. John Edwards is much better at it.
*made up numbers
Kayla
October 18th, 2007 at 8:56 pm
I love Sylvia and think that she is a great person and psychic. I did notice that one of the predictions is now correct Jennifer Lopez is pregnant as of mid 2007. Ok, its not 2006 but no one is perfect not even psychics. I understand if you don’t update this one to a hit. But, I would like to put out there that she got this one right.
P.S. I believe everyone can definately say that bush has a neurological problem maybe she got this one right too.
Sophia
October 19th, 2007 at 3:42 pm
SYLVIA BROWNE IS A SAINT AND A GOD is this true? of course not. Has she ever assumed this or has she ever confessed to such statement? Sylvia Browne is a Human being like any other. She makes mistakes because its human nature. SHOULD WE ALL LISTEN TO HER AND WORSHIP HER WORDS?????? NO THAT IS UP TO EVERY SINGLE INDIVIUAL. ATLEAST SHE TRIES TO EXPLAIN ABOUT THE OTHER SIDE (HEAVEN)OR SOME SORT OF PARADISE. SHE GIVES COMFORT TO SOME AND HOPE FOR OTHERS. BUT LIKE ANY HUMAN BEING SHE DESIRES TO MAKE MONEY BECAUSE SHE IS HUMAN AND LIKE EVERYTHING ELSE ON THIS EARTH IS NOT FREE. OF COURSE IT ISN’T RIGHT TO STEAL FROM PEOPLE NOR TO LIE TO THEM ABOUT LOVED ONES WHO HAVE PASSED AWAY AND SUCH AND SO MY FINAL OPINION AND BELIEF GOES BACK TO EVERYONE BEING RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR OWN ACTIONS AND CONSEQUENCES. :IF YOU WANT TO BELIEVE IN SYLVIA BROWNE AND WISH TO FOLLOW HER LECTURES AND WORDS THEN GO FOR IT, KNOCK YOURSELF OUT. IT IS YOUR DESICION AND YOUR RIGHT. : IF YOU DON’T LIKE OR DON’T WISH TO BELIEVE HER PHILOSOPHY OF LIFE, DEATH AND AFTERLIFE THEN KEEP YOUR FEELINGS AND BELIEFS TO YOURSELF PLEASE DO NOT MAKE PEOPLE FEEL BAD ABOUT THEMSELVES JUST BECAUSE YOU DON’T FEEL THE WAY THEY DO OR BECAUSE YOU DON’T BELIEVE WHAT THEY BELIEVE KEEP IT TO YOURSELF AND IF THERE IS A GOD OUT THERE BECAUSE I MAY SELF BELIEVE IN A SUPER NATURAL BEING, THEN MAY HE OR SHE BLESS YOU ALL AND BEST LUCK TO ALL LIFE IS A QUEST AND A TOUGH JOURNEY ITSELF. DON’T COMPLICATED MORE THAN WHAT IT ALREADY IS. PEACE ~
KATHY DOOLAGHTY
October 20th, 2007 at 11:39 pm
SYLVIA, I WATCH YOU ALL THE TIME ON MONTEL WILLIAMS. I BELIEVE IN YOU, AND I LOVE YOU AND MONTEL. IF I HAD ONE WISH IT WOULD BE TO MEET YOU AND MONTEL IN PERSON.
fred
October 20th, 2007 at 11:57 pm
personally, i like watching sylvia altho i take her readings as entertainment only. i believe psychics and mediums do exist but are they of
God? the bottom line is this… the bible says to stay away from them, that they are instruments of the devil and i tend to put my trust and faith in Gods word. sure, they speak of God etc but even the devil knows that God exist, thats why he perverts all that God does. also, its jus my personal belief but i think when you are dead your soul is at rest unless it is one that is not in heaven sooo personally, i hope i dont hear from one of my loved ones cause i want to know that they are at peace with Jesus.
Undine
October 21st, 2007 at 4:10 pm
Personally, I believe that psychics and mediums do exist. However, I can tell you that Sylvia Browne is not one of them. Yes, I know that no one (even psychics) are perfect or 100% accurate, but there should be some level of accuracy beyond just 10% or less, especially for the amount of money Sylvia Browne charges. There are more gifted tarot and palm readers out there, and you don’t see them charging hundreds of dollars for an inaccurate 20 minutes. True psychics don’t make spectacles out of themselves.
Her fans claim to watch her so devotedly on Montel, so here’s a suggestion. Perhaps you should really watch her. I mean, actually watch her mannerisms. When someone asked if she saw anyone around them, she looked up at the ceiling (the classic sign of someone thinking), then closed her eyes. Not once did she look at them, or even to the side of them. Montel answers most of the questions before she even has the chance, so she goes along with him. She constantly rolls her eyes. She’s cold and heartless in the way she addresses people, and sounds impatient, like she believes herself above it all. She definitely is not anywhere near the speaking ability of someone who has a Masters in English (like she claims). I do find it funny that some of the people who have commented in her defence have been extremely lacking in their grasp of the English language and simple Elementary school grammar, yet they claim everyone who doubts Sylvia Browne needs an education.
I find it amazing, however, that she’s still sucking the life, joy, and money from her victims, considering how much evidence there is against her. There is none in her favor.
Undine
October 21st, 2007 at 4:11 pm
Personally, I believe that psychics and mediums do exist. However, I can tell you that Sylvia Browne is not one of them. Yes, I know that no one (even psychics) are perfect or 100% accurate, but there should be some level of accuracy beyond just 10% or less, especially for the amount of money Sylvia Browne charges. There are more gifted tarot and palm readers out there, and you don’t see them charging hundreds of dollars for an inaccurate 20 minutes. True psychics don’t make spectacles out of themselves.
Her fans claim to watch her so devotedly on Montel, so here’s a suggestion. Perhaps you should really watch her. I mean, actually watch her mannerisms. When someone asked if she saw anyone around them, she looked up at the ceiling (the classic sign of someone thinking), then closed her eyes. Not once did she look at them, or even to the side of them. Montel answers most of the questions before she even has the chance, so she goes along with him. She constantly rolls her eyes. She’s cold and heartless in the way she addresses people, and sounds impatient, like she believes herself above it all. She definitely is not anywhere near the speaking ability of someone who has a Masters in English (like she claims). I do find it funny that some of the people who have commented in her defence have been extremely lacking in their grasp of the English language and simple Elementary school grammar, yet they claim everyone who doubts Sylvia Browne needs an education.
I find it amazing, however, that she’s still sucking the life, joy, and money from her victims, considering how much evidence there is against her. There is none in her favor.
(If this is double posted, I apologize. There was an error the first time.)
Shntel
October 22nd, 2007 at 11:57 pm
Sylvia Browne is a very blessed soul, and despite your negative and worthless comments, she has provided guidance to so many people in need of it. Disproving her spirituality is not only disrespectful of her work and God-given gift, but also a waste of time and energy. The bottom line is you’re not her judge…her Creator is the judge of her life/efforts/spirit. We need more people like Sylvia to “tell it like it is.” The seat of judgement is not yours! Sylvia clearly states that we all have a place within us that we can go to inorder to get our own answers. Have you done this? She’s not wrong about that. She shares her gift with us, other people with gifts try to control. I’m thankful for the love that she has for the Creator and all creations. she takes us back to the simplicity that we often forget about.
dee
October 24th, 2007 at 3:14 am
After the death of my mother, I sought out Sylvia Brown for a reading however, due to her long waiting list(2 years)I was reffered to her son who has or should I say supposedly has Psychic powers like his mother, ( Sylvia promotes his abilities from time to time on Montel) he charges half the price of Sylvia, and I can say from experience that he was very general and the information he gave could have applied to anyone, my reading was very rushed and nothing that he said would happen did. In my own experience I feel that Sylvia and her organization prey on people who are grieving and are looking for some peace of mind about a loved on, a relationship, or financial difficulties. I was taken, don’t be a victim of this falsehood. I paid 400 dollars for something my neighborhood psychic could have told me for 20 bucks!
Kathy Hopkins
October 24th, 2007 at 2:08 pm
Hello, I found some of her predictions today on Montel. He was showing some past shows of her and one of her earlier this year making celebrity predictions. Normally i dont’ watch his show on wednesdays because she makes me gag. But , was busy working and too lazy to change channel.
1. She said That nicole and her country singing man will end up in divorce
2. She sad that Angelina and Brad will end in divorce.
3. She said that J Lo and her husband marc will split up and J Lo will never get pregnant because something is wrong with her. (she may be wrong on that one, isn’t jlo pregnant right now?)
4. She said that Tom and Kate will split up in 2 years. (2009)
5. She said that Martha stewarts show is going to get canceled.
Also, he showed some past predictions of hers trying to show how she was right. So i was waiting for the commercial and anticipating and kind of excited to FINALLY SEE SOMETHING OF HERS RIGHT !!! — The ONLY “ONE”. yes the only “ONE” they showed, that was it, i waited for “ONE”.
was her , back in the day before princess DI died. she said that charles family was going to try and make “DI” look crazy and he would end up getting back with the lady he’s married to now.
meka
October 24th, 2007 at 2:22 pm
who did she say will be the us president for 2008
Alfonso Higglsby
October 25th, 2007 at 2:18 pm
Sylvia you are totally full of crap and all of your predictions are as well. I think you just anoter crazy lady just trying to get a little bit of attention.
Nicole
October 27th, 2007 at 5:18 pm
What’s the difference…in the end people will believe what they want to. I say for all of you to take a step and for some of you a leap.. out of the box of ideas you live with and open your minds to the idea that some things are true whether there is scientific proof or not. Take some time to do the research and obtain the facts. Sylvia has worked with the police force for decades and has had a significant positive impact with the people she works with. She’s obviously just not some crazy lady….she’s real so for all of you who know nothing about her and just want to slam the idea of what she stands for go ahead..it won’t change anything..she’s gifted and always will be..
Dyana
October 27th, 2007 at 9:13 pm
Well she “Predicted” that Jennifer Lopez would not be able to concieve or did not want too, But low and behold she is now pregnant and supposidly with twins hmmmmmmmmmm….????
MIKE
October 29th, 2007 at 2:27 am
WHAT A FREAKIN USELESS SITE: OPEN YOUR MINDS YOU KNOTHEADSSSSS!
Dave
October 31st, 2007 at 2:37 pm
The Bible, written a long time ago, weather i believe or not does not matter, the teachings give people hope, thats fine, but it’s common sense. I have never read sylvias books and do not plan to. If they give people hope, fine. Are her predictions corect? who cares. Are people wasteing time and money? who cares. It’s theres to waste. Once, when I was upset(dont recall over what) my father said to me(i think he took this saying from somewhere)” David, why are you letting this upset you so much? It’s small stuff and in the end it’s all small stuff” I try to remember this when I find myself getting upset and wasteing energy over small stuff. I caught part of Montel today, entertaining, as was this site. Give it a rest, I am. People will argue over her ’till the cows come home, and the cows will come home and she will be forgotten, she’s small stuff. thanks for your time, Dave
Camille
November 1st, 2007 at 7:06 pm
I hate to tell you all this, but there is an Other Side. I’ve been there momentarily as my sister was dying and I did not know it at the time until the phone call the next second. I’ve been there a few times and this was before I read her books or knew of her. While she is not 100 percent correct and I find some stuff hard to swallow, I know that some of it, even a small percentage, is right. I do question Christianity and religions around this world. I always have since I was a kid. I have seen a psychic and my friend is one also and guided me in the right direction. If I did not follow her advice, my life would have been destroyed. She gave me a light at the end when I thought it was all hopeless. Some psychics are real and this one did not charge me a dime except for friendship in return.
John
November 2nd, 2007 at 9:08 am
I can’t help but notice most of the people who have posted positive things about this charlatan are women. Perhaps this is a coincidence, perhaps it’s an indicator. People who “believe” with their emotions and do not “understand” with their minds are rubes ripe for picking. This is why the Bible tells women to be in subjection to their husbands. Women’s emotions are great and they make a house a home (they can also make you VERY glad you’re a man), but in day-to-day affairs they need to be tempered by a male mind.
As for the men who believe; well, you’re just idiots. The average IQ is 100 (and the average is pretty sad), but there are as many below the average as above. Get your IQ tested (by a reliable source - not a website, but a psychologist) and when you discover it’s in the 80s, ask for lots of advice from intelligent people you may know and FOLLOW it. If you enjoy rap, NASCAR, WWF(E), “monster” trucks, or things of that type; if you don’t have the money for a reliable IQ test, just assume that you’re stupid and get someone to run your life for you.
Jessica
November 2nd, 2007 at 11:38 am
Its the end of 2007 and some of this stuff is now coming true…
Angel
November 3rd, 2007 at 5:11 am
We all need someone or something to believe in. Just as there are numerous
“religions”, there are numerous “psychics”.
We have freedom of religion as much as we have the choice to believe one psychic or another psychic. If somehow, someone is giving another the ability to “believe” and it helps that person to better themselfs, should we not be happy. Why is so much precious time being spent trying to prove someone is wrong rather than being happy
for what good that someone has done for another. You have been allowed to believe in what you want to, enjoy, rejoice and share with others the happiness you have. Do not condemn another for not believing the way you do, for they may not find
themselfs happy, as well as you may not find yourself happy if believe the way they do. LIVE, LOVE, LAUGH, AND ALLOW OTHER TO DO THE SAME.<